Tusi or not Tusi

2013 Second prize
Arthur Shapiro and Alex Rose-Henig
American University, USA

Facebooktwittermail
adminTusi or not Tusi

Color Wagon Wheel

2012 Third prize
Arthur Shapiro, William Kistler, and Alex Rose-Henig
American University, USA

Facebooktwittermail
adminColor Wagon Wheel

Grouping by Contrast

2011 Second prize
Erica Dixon, Arthur Shapiro & Kai Hamburger
American University, USA, Universität Giessen, Germany
This movie requires Flash Player 9

Luminance levels of four disks modulate in time. The top two disks become white when the bottom two disks become black, and viceversa. When placed against a split background, the disks group together along the diagonals. This grouping pattern follows the contrasts of the disks relative to their backgrounds.

Facebooktwittermail
adminGrouping by Contrast

The Exchange of Features, Textures and Faces

Arthur Shapiro & Gideon Caplovitz
American University, USA, University of Reno, USA
This movie requires Flash Player 9

The binding problem is a fundamental issue in neuroscience. The term refers to the fact that the brain processes color, motion, and other visual features separately and in parallel, yet our perception is of a unified world, populated by coherent objects. Here we investigate the binding problem with illusions that show—rather dramatically—that features can bind and rebind to moving objects. We show that this effect depends on the color of the background and on whether observers view the illusions centrally or peripherally.

Facebooktwittermail
adminThe Exchange of Features, Textures and Faces

The break of the curveball

2009 First prize
Arthur Shapiro, Zhong-Lin Lu, Emily Knight, & Robert Ennis

American University, University of Southern California, Dartmouth College, SUNY College of Optometry, USA

In baseball, a curveball creates a physical effect and a perceptual puzzle. The physical effect (the curve) arises because the ball’s rotation leads to a deflection in the ball’s path. The perceptual puzzle arises because the deflection is actually gradual but is often perceived as an abrupt change in direction (the break). Our illusions suggest that the perceived “break” may be caused by the transition from the central visual system to the peripheral visual system. Like a curveball, the spinning disks in the illusions appear to abruptly change direction when an observer switches from foveal to peripheral viewing.

Facebooktwittermail
adminThe break of the curveball

Dramatically Different Percepts between Foveal and Peripheral Vision

Emily Knight, Arthur Shapiro & Zhong-Lin Lu

Bucknell University and University of Southern California, USA
This movie requires Flash Player 9

An object viewed directly (foveal vision) appears noticeably different from the same object viewed indirectly (peripheral vision). To investigate this aspect of how we see, our illusions accentuate the differences between foveal and peripheral perception. In one of these illusions, the “peripheral escalator,” zebra-like columns swing back and forth across the screen. Viewed foveally, the columns appear to move along a horizontal path; viewed peripherally (focus your gaze several inches above the screen), the columns appear to shift back and forth along a diagonal path. The results illustrate that peripheral vision is not just a blurry version of foveal vision.

Read more about the illusion and possible explanations

Facebooktwittermail
adminDramatically Different Percepts between Foveal and Peripheral Vision

Perpetual Collisions

Arthur Shapiro & Emily Knight

Bucknell University, USA
This movie requires Flash Player 9

In the perpetual collisions illusion, the pink and the yellow columns seem always to be headed towards (or away from) each other, but they never meet (and they never grow further apart). Actually, the colored fields are completely stationary; an appearance of motion is generated by the spinning black and white diamonds located alongside the columns. Click on the button to add diagonal bars and remove the edges from opposing diamonds. Notice that the information at the edges makes the colored fields move diagonally, yet when the bars are not there and all the edges are visible, the fields move horizontally.

Read more about the illusion and possible explanations

Facebooktwittermail
adminPerpetual Collisions

Where Has All the Motion Gone?

2007 Third prize
Arthur Shapiro & Emily Knight

Bucknell University, USA
This movie requires Flash Player 9

Click on the big button to toggle between a blurred version of the display and an unblurred version. When the display is blurred, the motion is dramatic; when the display is not blurred, there is only minimal motion. The effect can also be seen with a defocused lens. Blur eliminates high-spatial frequencies. It does not add information to the image. Why, therefore, does the removal of high-spatial frequencies add motion to the display? The buttons and levers allow control over the many of the parameters in the display.

View more demos

Read more about the illusion and possible explanations

Facebooktwittermail
adminWhere Has All the Motion Gone?

’Weaves’ and the Hermann Grid

Kai Hamburger & Arthur Shapiro

University of Giessen, Germany, and Bucknell University, USA
This movie requires Flash Player 9

View full size demo

Read more about the illusion and possible explanations

Facebooktwittermail
admin’Weaves’ and the Hermann Grid

Swimmers, Eels and Other Gradient-Gradient Illusions

Emily Knight & Arthur Shapiro

Bucknell University, USA
This movie requires Flash Player 9

The red button adds/removes half of the background grating. The swimmers bob up and down when they are in front of the grating but not when they are in front of a uniform background

View more demos

Read more about the illusion and possible explanations

Facebooktwittermail
adminSwimmers, Eels and Other Gradient-Gradient Illusions